In the workplace, the idea of a shared uniform often raises questions about hierarchy, unity, and practicality. Should leaders, who are traditionally seen as separate from their teams, wear the same uniform as their employees?
Two industry leaders, Aaron Azzopardi and Brian Muscat, weigh in on the topic based on their unique approaches.
After posting a photo online of himself wearing the same polo shirt as factory floor workers, Mr Azzopardi was surprised by the response, with the hundreds of reactions suggesting that he had struck a nerve.
For him, wearing the same uniform as his team is an intentional choice that he believes fosters equality and unity, breaking down barriers between leadership and employees.
“When visitors come to our factory, they’re often surprised to see me in the same shirt as everyone else,” he shares. To him, this alignment visually reinforces that while roles may differ, every team member contributes equally to the company’s mission.
Mr Azzopardi believes that shared uniforms reduce perceived status differences and emphasise a collective identity, helping all employees feel part of the same mission and values.
“Wearing the same shirt sends a clear message: everyone works for the same company and is treated equally,” he explains. A shared uniform not only strengthens corporate identity but also allows leaders to represent the brand and its values consistently.
Beyond unity, Azzopardi notes that uniforms simplify daily decisions, like choosing what to wear, enabling him and others to focus on more essential tasks.
Moreover, in industries such as electronics, safety plays a critical role in uniform selection. Mr Azzopardi points out that his company’s uniforms are specifically designed to be electrostatic discharge (ESD) safe, ensuring that sensitive components are protected. By standardising these safety requirements across all roles, he argues, the company maintains a safe working environment for both employees and equipment.
MaltaCEOs.mt also reached out to Brian Muscat, who serves as Managing Director at Multi Packaging Ltd, whose view contrasts with that of Mr Azzopardi.
In his organisation, different employee groups wear uniforms that correspond to their specific functions: workers on the shop floor wear high-visibility orange vests, while technicians are dressed in black for easy identification. Managers, including production supervisors, wear blue polo shirts, providing a visual distinction without implying a rigid hierarchy.
“We work in an institution where certain standards need to be kept,” Mr Muscat explains, arguing that uniforms set these standards, reinforcing professionalism and safety.
Mr Muscat himself adheres to safety protocols, wearing a hi-viz vest and safety shoes when on the shop floor. Although leaders in his company don’t wear the same uniforms as entry-level workers, they visibly comply with safety regulations to reinforce that everyone, regardless of role, is accountable for upholding the company’s standards.
Mr Muscat’s approach highlights the importance of adapting uniforms to fit practical needs without completely removing the visual cues that help delineate roles. Distinguishing between employees based on function, rather than grade or hierarchy, supports operational clarity while maintaining safety and visual cohesion on the job floor.
He acknowledges the importance of unifying standards to prevent a disjointed appearance, where employees would otherwise wear shorts or other non-uniform attire.
“There are rules and regulations, and everyone has to be seen following them,” he asserts, suggesting that a sense of unity is achieved through shared adherence to company policies rather than identical attire.
Both approaches offer valuable perspectives on workplace culture and leadership. Mr Azzopardi’s choice to wear the same uniform as his team underscores a message of inclusivity and shared purpose, which can inspire a cohesive culture where employees feel recognised as equals. Mr Muscat’s approach, while still fostering unity, maintains functional distinctions that serve the organisation’s diverse needs and reinforces professional standards through varied uniforms.
Ultimately, whether leaders should wear the same uniform as their employees depends on the company’s goals, values, and operational requirements. In settings where equality and a strong sense of identity are key, a shared uniform for all roles can convey that leaders and employees are united. Conversely, in companies with multiple roles and safety concerns, functional uniforms that distinguish but don’t divide can be equally effective.
The awards celebrated excellence in Malta’s business landscape.
Workplace bullying in Malta is a widespread issue with significant economic implications, costing the nation up to four per cent ...
Øystein Engebretsen, who had served as Non-Executive Director with the firm since 2018, makes an exit.
The CEO argues that a strong investment portfolio should be based on four assets and not one.