In an age where we can reach a colleague in three clicks and five apps, it’s ironic that communication breakdowns are still one of the biggest challenges facing businesses.

With a sea of tools at our disposal – email, Slack, WhatsApp, Teams or Zoom – it’s easy to confuse access with alignment.

But as one Maltese CEO recently pointed out in his LinkedIn post, “not all communication channels are created equal, and it’s time we stopped pretending they are.”

Stephen Caruana, Managing Director at Pixie Software, outlined three common workplace scenarios where email, despite being the default, often falls short.

  • Complex or sensitive topics where tone matters
  • Discussions that trigger long reply chains
  • Cases where the sender isn’t confident his message will be read

According to Mr Caruana, instead of driving clarity, email in these moments can lead to misunderstandings and hinder progress.

“Email strips away tone, context, and emotional undertones,” he wrote.

“A quick phone call can resolve in moments what might take hours of email ping-pong,” Mr Caruana continued.

He also highlighted that when there is doubt if the messages sent will even be read, sending out an email is “like shouting out into the void and hoping someone answers.”

Convenience does not equal effectiveness

No one can deny that email is an invaluable tool. It’s structured, traceable, and excellent for sharing detailed information or creating a paper trail.

However, relying on it as the default channel for everything can stall progress, sow confusion, and silently erode culture. Communication is not only about efficiency but also connection.

The medium matters

A 2022 study by The Economist Intelligence Unit, titled Communication Barriers in the Modern Workplace, surveyed over 400 senior executives and found that:

  • 44 per cent said miscommunication causes a delay or failure to complete projects
  • 31 per cent said it leads to low employee morale
  • 18 per cent said it results in the loss of sales

Most notably, the study emphasised that using the wrong medium for the message, is a key driver of these breakdowns. Email, for instance, was often cited as overused for real-time or complex communication, leading to confusion, delays, and disengagement.

Choosing the right medium

Here’s how you can approach messages differently depending on the content;

Use email when:

  • You’re sending structured updates or detailed documentation
  • You need a written record
  • Time sensitivity is low

Use instant messaging (slack, teams etc) or a call when:

  • You need a quick clarification or status update
  • Tone is informal
  • You want to reduce inbox noise

Use face-to-face when:

  • The topic is emotionally charged or sensitive
  • Nuance, negotiation, or trust is involved
  • There’s a risk of misinterpretation

Communication is no longer just a soft skill. It’s a strategic one. Choosing the right channel isn't about tech preference, it’s about ensuring the message gets through, gets understood, and gets actioned.

In business, clarity is everything.

Related

Maresca Demanuele starts new role as Senior Manager at Siemens’ Dutch wind farms

21 August 2026
by Robert Fenech

She will be working on the Hollandse Kust offshore wind farm regions in the Netherlands.

Appeal reform welcome, but ending speculation requires deeper changes, says KTP President

21 August 2026
by Kevin Schembri Orland

‘Unfortunately, the general belief is that issuing or refusing permits is planning,’ said Andre Pizzuto. ‘It's not.’

Christian Debono joins VCFC as Chief Commercial Officer

19 August 2026
by Kevin Schembri Orland

'After 27 incredible years with HSBC, it’s time for a new chapter,' he said.

€6.9m subsea cable deal ‘the foundation for what we want to build in Cyprus’ – BMIT CEO

19 August 2026
by Robert Fenech

CEO Christian Sammut said BMIT ‘set out to broaden what the company is built on.’